You will learn about the various processes and procedures in the stages of incident detection, investigation, analysis, and response. Then, you’ll analyze the details of suspicious file hashes. You’ll learn about the importance of documentation and evidence collection during the detection and response stages. Finally, you’ll approximate an incident’s chronology by mapping artifacts to reconstruct an incident’s timeline.
Learning Objectives
- Perform artifact investigations to analyze and verify security incidents.
- Illustrate documentation best practices during the incident response lifecycle.
- Assess alerts using evidence and determine the appropriate triaging steps.
- Identify the steps to contain, eradicate, and recover from an incident.
- Describe the processes and procedures involved in the post-incident phase.
- Incident detection and verification
- Video: Welcome to module 3
- Video: The detection and analysis phase of the lifecycle
- Reading: Cybersecurity incident detection methods
- Video: MK: Changes in the cybersecurity industry
- Reading: Indicators of compromise
- Reading: Analyze indicators of compromise with investigative tools
- Practice Quiz: Activity: Investigate a suspicious file hash
- Reading: Activity Exemplar: Investigate a suspicious file hash
- Key takeaways
- Create and use documentation
- Video: The benefits of documentation
- Video: Document evidence with chain of custody forms
- Reading: Best practices for effective documentation
- Video: The value of cybersecurity playbooks
- Practice Quiz: Activity: Use a playbook to respond to a phishing incident
- Reading: Activity Exemplar: Use a playbook to respond to a phishing incident
- Response and recovery
- Post-incident actions
- Review: Incident investigation and response
Incident detection and verification
Video: Welcome to module 3
- You’ve built a strong foundation in networking and practical security skills like packet capture and analysis.
- Next, you’ll tackle the entire life cycle of security incidents, from detection to recovery.
- We’ll start with incident investigation and verification, diving into response plans and processes.
- Finally, you’ll explore post-incident actions for learning and improvement.
- Get ready to master the complete incident lifecycle!
Video: The detection and analysis phase of the lifecycle
- The Detection and Analysis phase: Identifying and verifying security incidents.
- Detection: Promptly finding security events, but not all events are incidents.
- Tools like IDS and SIEM: Analyzing event data and sending alerts for potential threats.
- Analysis: Investigating and validating alerts to determine if an incident occurred.
- Challenges:
- Incomplete detection: Tools have limitations, and deployment might be incomplete.
- High alert volume: Often caused by misconfigured settings or real threats.
- As a security analyst, you’ll learn to effectively analyze alerts.
This summary captures the key points of the text, focusing on the Detection and Analysis phase, its challenges, and the importance of analyst skills. It also highlights the upcoming dive into alert analysis training.
Welcome, Cyber Detectives! This tutorial plunges you into the heart of incident response – the Detection and Analysis phase. Buckle up as we equip you with the skills to identify lurking threats and separate true alarms from the digital noise.
What is the Detection and Analysis Phase?
Imagine a security incident as a shadowy intruder in your network. This phase is about shining a light on that intruder, verifying their presence, and understanding their motives. You, the analyst, are the detective hot on their trail.
The Art of Detection:
- From Events to Incidents: Not all network events are security breaches. Think website visits or password resets – normal business. Your challenge is to spot unusual activity, often with the help of specialized tools like:
- IDS (Intrusion Detection System): Scans network traffic for suspicious patterns.
- SIEM (Security Information and Event Management): Aggregates and analyzes data from various sources to detect potential threats.
- The Alert Symphony: When these tools detect something fishy, they raise an alert. But remember, not every alert is a five-alarm fire. You’ll need to:
- Triage alerts: Evaluate their severity and prioritize investigation.
- Beware of false positives: Misconfigured settings or even harmless events can trigger false alarms. Don’t waste time on these red herrings.
The Science of Analysis:
- Diving Deeper: Now that you have a promising alert, it’s time to put on your Sherlock Holmes hat:
- Collect evidence: Logs, network captures, suspicious files – gather all the clues.
- Analyze indicators of compromise (IOCs): Look for telltale signs like malware signatures, suspicious network connections, or unusual user activity.
- Connect the dots: Piece together the evidence to build a timeline and understand the attacker’s actions.
Challenges and Countermeasures:
- The Elusive Intruder: Detection and analysis aren’t foolproof. Attackers constantly evolve, and even the best tools have limitations. Stay sharp:
- Embrace the unknown: New vulnerabilities emerge, so continuous learning is key.
- Refine your tools: Regularly review and update your IDS/SIEM configurations to catch new threats.
- Alert Overload: Don’t drown in a sea of notifications! Optimize your analysis process:
- Prioritize effectively: Focus on high-risk alerts and investigate them thoroughly.
- Automate where possible: Use tools to handle basic tasks and free up your time for complex analysis.
Mastering the Art and Science:
This tutorial is just the beginning of your journey to becoming a top-notch incident analyst. Remember, practice makes perfect:
- Test your skills: Hone your detection and analysis abilities with simulations and exercises.
- Stay informed: Keep abreast of the latest threats and trends in the cybersecurity landscape.
By cultivating your critical thinking, technical skills, and a relentless curiosity, you’ll be ready to face any digital intruder and keep your organization safe.
Ready to delve deeper? Next, we’ll explore the tools and techniques for effective alert analysis and incident verification. Keep your detective game strong!
This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of the Detection and Analysis phase, highlighting key concepts, challenges, and tips for success. It also incorporates engaging language and a detective theme to keep the content interesting and relatable. Remember to adjust the level of technical detail and examples based on your target audience.
What actions do security analysts perform during the Detection and Analysis phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle? Select two answers.
Validate security alerts, Investigate security alerts
Security analysts investigate and validate security alerts during the Detection and Analysis phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle.
Incidents happen, and as a security
analyst, you’ll likely be tasked with investigating and responding to security
incidents at some point in your career. Let’s examine the Detection and Analysis
phase of the incident response lifecycle. This is where incident response
teams verify and analyze incidents. Detection enables the prompt
discovery of security events. Remember not all events are incidents,
but all incidents are events. Events are regular occurrences in business
operations, like visits to a website or password reset requests. IDS and SIEM tools collect and analyze event data from different sources
to identify potential unusual activity. If an incident is detected, such as
a malicious actor successfully gaining unauthorized access to an account,
then an alert is sent out. Security teams then begin
the Analysis phase. Analysis involves the investigation and
validation of alerts. During the analysis process, analysts
must apply their critical thinking and incident analysis skills to
investigate and validate alerts. They’ll examine indicators of compromise
to determine if an incident has occurred. This can be a challenge for
a couple of reasons. The challenge with detection is it’s
impossible to detect everything. Even great detection tools have
limitations in how they work, and automated tools may not be fully deployed across
an organization due to limited resources. Some incidents are unavoidable,
which is why it’s important for organizations to have an incident
response plan in place. Analysts often receive a high
volume of alerts per shift, sometimes even thousands. Most of the time, high alert volumes are
caused by misconfigured alert settings. For example, alert rules
that are too broad and not tuned to an organization’s
environment create false positives. Other times, high alert volumes
can be legitimate alerts caused by malicious actors taking advantage
of a newly discovered vulnerability. As a security analyst, it’s important that
you’re equipped to effectively analyze alerts and coming up, you’ll do just that.
Welcome back! I want to commend you on such
a fantastic job you’re doing so far. The skills you are learning will create
a solid foundation as you begin your security career. In the previous section, you applied
your networking knowledge to deepen your understanding of network traffic. You practiced some skills that
security analysts use on the job like capturing network traffic and
dissecting packets. Next, we’ll examine the life cycle of
a security incident from beginning to end. You’ll focus on how to detect,
respond, and recover from an incident. Coming up,
you’ll learn how to investigate and verify an incident once
it’s been detected. You’ll explore the plans and
processes behind incident response. Finally, you’ll learn about the
post-incident actions that organizations take to learn and
improve from the experience. At the end of this section, you’ll gain a comprehensive understanding
of an incident’s lifecycle. You ready? Let’s begin!
Reading: Cybersecurity incident detection methods
Reading
Security analysts use detection tools to help them discover threats, but there are additional methods of detection that can be used as well.
Previously, you learned about how detection tools can identify attacks like data exfiltration. In this reading, you’ll be introduced to different detection methods that organizations can employ to discover threats.
Methods of detection
During the Detection and Analysis Phase of the incident response lifecycle, security teams are notified of a possible incident and work to investigate and verify the incident by collecting and analyzing data. As a reminder, detection refers to the prompt discovery of security events and analysis involves the investigation and validation of alerts.
As you’ve learned, an intrusion detection system (IDS) can detect possible intrusions and send out alerts to security analysts to investigate the suspicious activity. Security analysts can also use security information and event management (SIEM) tools to detect, collect, and analyze security data.
You’ve also learned that there are challenges with detection. Even the best security teams can fail to detect real threats for a variety of reasons. For example, detection tools can only detect what security teams configure them to monitor. If they aren’t properly configured, they can fail to detect suspicious activity, leaving systems vulnerable to attack. It’s important for security teams to use additional methods of detection to increase their coverage and accuracy.
Threat hunting
Threats evolve and attackers advance their tactics and techniques. Automated, technology-driven detection can be limited in keeping up to date with the evolving threat landscape. Human-driven detection like threat hunting combines the power of technology with a human element to discover hidden threats left undetected by detection tools.
Threat hunting is the proactive search for threats on a network. Security professionals use threat hunting to uncover malicious activity that was not identified by detection tools and as a way to do further analysis on detections. Threat hunting is also used to detect threats before they cause damage. For example, fileless malware is difficult for detection tools to identify. It’s a form of malware that uses sophisticated evasion techniques such as hiding in memory instead of using files or applications, allowing it to bypass traditional methods of detection like signature analysis. With threat hunting, the combination of active human analysis and technology is used to identify threats like fileless malware.
Note: Threat hunting specialists are known as threat hunters. Threat hunters perform research on emerging threats and attacks and then determine the probability of an organization being vulnerable to a particular attack. Threat hunters use a combination of threat intelligence, indicators of compromise, indicators of attack, and machine learning to search for threats in an organization.
Threat intelligence
Organizations can improve their detection capabilities by staying updated on the evolving threat landscape and understanding the relationship between their environment and malicious actors. One way to understand threats is by using threat intelligence, which is evidence-based threat information that provides context about existing or emerging threats.
Threat intelligence can come from private or public sources like:
- Industry reports: These often include details about attacker’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP).
- Government advisories: Similar to industry reports, government advisories include details about attackers’ TTP.
- Threat data feeds: Threat data feeds provide a stream of threat-related data that can be used to help protect against sophisticated attackers like advanced persistent threats (APTs). APTs are instances when a threat actor maintains unauthorized access to a system for an extended period of time. The data is usually a list of indicators like IP addresses, domains, and file hashes.
It can be difficult for organizations to efficiently manage large volumes of threat intelligence. Organizations can leverage a threat intelligence platform (TIP) which is an application that collects, centralizes, and analyzes threat intelligence from different sources. TIPs provide a centralized platform for organizations to identify and prioritize relevant threats and improve their security posture.
Note: Threat intelligence data feeds are best used to add context to detections. They should not drive detections completely and should be assessed before applied to an organization.
Cyber deception
Cyber deception involves techniques that deliberately deceive malicious actors with the goal of increasing detection and improving defensive strategies.
Honeypots are an example of an active cyber defense mechanism that uses deception technology. Honeypots are systems or resources that are created as decoys vulnerable to attacks with the purpose of attracting potential intruders. For example, having a fake file labeled Client Credit Card Information – 2022 can be used to capture the activity of malicious actors by tricking them into accessing the file because it appears to be legitimate. Once a malicious actor tries to access this file, security teams are alerted.
Key takeaways
Various detection methods can be implemented to identify and locate security events in an environment. It’s essential for organizations to use a variety of detection methods, tools, and technologies to adapt to the ever evolving threat landscape and better protect assets.
Resources for more information
If you would like to explore more on threat hunting and threat intelligence, here are some resources:
- An informational repository about threat hunting from The ThreatHunting Project
- Research on state-sponsored hackers from Threat Analysis Group (TAG)
Video: MK: Changes in the cybersecurity industry
MK, Director in the Office of the CISO for Google Cloud, highlights the evolving nature of cybersecurity and the need for agility to combat persistent threats.
Key takeaways:
- Dual role: Protecting Google Cloud and empowering customers with security tools.
- Cybersecurity career: Transition from FBI special agent to cybersecurity expert.
- Adversary agility: Rapidly adapt tactics to bypass obstacles.
- Industry challenge: Continuously prepare for unpredictable attacks.
- Agility and adaptability: Key qualities for cybersecurity professionals.
- Zero Trust: Trending security model moving away from historical trust-based access.
- Continual learning: Essential for navigating the unknown future of cybersecurity.
Points of emphasis:
- The industry can’t predict the future but must anticipate and respond to new threats.
- Agility, intellectual adaptability, and continuous learning are crucial for success.
- Zero Trust, while promising, is just a stepping stone in the evolving security landscape.
Overall, MK’s talk paints a dynamic picture of cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for constant vigilance, flexibility, and a thirst for knowledge in the face of ever-evolving threats.
[MUSIC] Hi, I’m MK, Director in the Office
of the CISO for Google Cloud. The role of the Chief Information Security
Officer is both to protect Google Cloud from a security standpoint. But also to ensure that we’re providing
all of the tools and products necessary so that our customers can achieve
their security outcomes as well. So I spent a number of years in
the US government, 32 years in fact, 22 of which were spent as a special agent
in the Federal Bureau of Investigation. About midway through
the course of my career, I had the opportunity to shift into
cybersecurity lanes, which initiated, or should I say, reinitiated my interest in
all things computers and computer science. One of the things that the industry
lacks is a sense of agility, that the adversary has in spades. When they identify something
that works for them, they continue to pound on it until and
unless there’s an obstacle. And then once that obstacle
is put in their way, they have shown an ability to easily pivot
their tactics and techniques so that they can bypass the obstacle in future
attempts to gain access to environments. And so none of us can predict the future. We’re not at any kind of final stage. This is a continually evolving industry. What you can ascertain is that we need
to be prepared in a variety of ways to combat what will certainly be
a persistent onslaught from the adversary. What that requires is
a certain sense of agility, you have to be comfortable
in existing in the unknown. But you also have to have the intellectual
aptitude in order to be able to digest and formulate new solutions on the fly. Zero Trust is a huge trend right now
because it’s both been a desire of the industry to move toward Zero Trust,
but also a requirement in some
areas around the world. Zero Trust is a movement away from the
historical way that we’ve done security in the past. Layman’s terms, so
you’re a business traveler, you travel with your business laptop and you check
into your hotel halfway around the world, and you need to get prepared and ready for
a business meeting that’s about to occur. Historically, you’d want to be able
to attest to the fact that that is an intended or qualified user within
the enterprise attempting to gain access to this information. And yes, based upon the information
that you have, the identity and coupling that with device information,
that user and device should have access to this information and
be able to make a determination about it. I do believe that the more that we
invest in the Zero Trust approach or architecture, it will get us to a good
point from which to pivot off of. But I think a lot of what’s
to come is unknown, and that means continual learning. It means, continually exposing yourself
to different parts of the industry so that we are prepared for
what may happen in the future.
Reading: Indicators of compromise
Reading
In this reading, you’ll be introduced to the concept of the Pyramid of Pain and you’ll explore examples of the different types of indicators of compromise. Understanding and applying this concept helps organizations improve their defense and reduces the damage an incident can cause.
Indicators of compromise
Indicators of compromise (IoCs) are observable evidence that suggests signs of a potential security incident. IoCs chart specific pieces of evidence that are associated with an attack, like a file name associated with a type of malware. You can think of an IoC as evidence that points to something that’s already happened, like noticing that a valuable has been stolen from inside of a car.
Indicators of attack (IoA) are the series of observed events that indicate a real-time incident. IoAs focus on identifying the behavioral evidence of an attacker, including their methods and intentions.
Essentially, IoCs help to identify the who and what of an attack after it’s taken place, while IoAs focus on finding the why and how of an ongoing or unknown attack. For example, observing a process that makes a network connection is an example of an IoA. The filename of the process and the IP address that the process contacted are examples of the related IoCs.
Note: Indicators of compromise are not always a confirmation that a security incident has happened. IoCs may be the result of human error, system malfunctions, and other reasons not related to security.
Pyramid of Pain
Not all indicators of compromise are equal in the value they provide to security teams. It’s important for security professionals to understand the different types of indicators of compromise so that they can quickly and effectively detect and respond to them. This is why security researcher David J. Bianco created the concept of the Pyramid of Pain, with the goal of improving how indicators of compromise are used in incident detection.
The Pyramid of Pain captures the relationship between indicators of compromise and the level of difficulty that malicious actors experience when indicators of compromise are blocked by security teams. It lists the different types of indicators of compromise that security professionals use to identify malicious activity.
Each type of indicator of compromise is separated into levels of difficulty. These levels represent the “pain” levels that an attacker faces when security teams block the activity associated with the indicator of compromise. For example, blocking an IP address associated with a malicious actor is labeled as easy because malicious actors can easily use different IP addresses to work around this and continue with their malicious efforts. If security teams are able to block the IoCs located at the top of the pyramid, the more difficult it becomes for attackers to continue their attacks. Here’s a breakdown of the different types of indicators of compromise found in the Pyramid of Pain.
- Hash values: Hashes that correspond to known malicious files. These are often used to provide unique references to specific samples of malware or to files involved in an intrusion.
- IP addresses: An internet protocol address like 192.168.1.1
- Domain names: A web address such as www.google.com
- Network artifacts: Observable evidence created by malicious actors on a network. For example, information found in network protocols such as User-Agent strings.
- Host artifacts: Observable evidence created by malicious actors on a host. A host is any device that’s connected on a network. For example, the name of a file created by malware.
- Tools: Software that’s used by a malicious actor to achieve their goal. For example, attackers can use password cracking tools like John the Ripper to perform password attacks to gain access into an account.
- Tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs): This is the behavior of a malicious actor. Tactics refer to the high-level overview of the behavior. Techniques provide detailed descriptions of the behavior relating to the tactic. Procedures are highly detailed descriptions of the technique. TTPs are the hardest to detect.
Key takeaways
Indicators of compromise and indicators of attack are valuable sources of information for security professionals when it comes to detecting incidents. The Pyramid of Pain is a concept that can be used to understand the different types of indicators of compromise and the value they have in detecting and stopping malicious activity.
Reading: Analyze indicators of compromise with investigative tools
Reading
So far, you’ve learned about the different types of detection methods that can be used to detect security incidents. This reading explores how investigative tools can be used during investigations to analyze suspicious indicators of compromise (IoCs) and build context around alerts. Remember, an IoC is observable evidence that suggests signs of a potential security incident.
Adding context to investigations
You’ve learned about the Pyramid of Pain which describes the relationship between indicators of compromise and the level of difficulty that malicious actors experience when indicators of compromise are blocked by security teams. You also learned about different types of IoCs, but as you know, not all IoCs are equal. Malicious actors can manage to evade detection and continue compromising systems despite having their IoC-related activity blocked or limited.
For example, identifying and blocking a single IP address associated with malicious activity does not provide a broader insight on an attack, nor does it stop a malicious actor from continuing their activity. Focusing on a single piece of evidence is like fixating on a single section of a painting: You miss out on the bigger picture.
Security analysts need a way to expand the use of IoCs so that they can add context to alerts. Threat intelligence is evidence-based threat information that provides context about existing or emerging threats. By accessing additional information related to IoCs, security analysts can expand their viewpoint to observe the bigger picture and construct a narrative that helps inform their response actions.
By adding context to an IoC—for instance, identifying other artifacts related to the suspicious IP address, such as suspicious network communications or unusual processes—security teams can start to develop a detailed picture of a security incident. This context can help security teams detect security incidents faster and take a more informed approach in their response.
The power of crowdsourcing
Crowdsourcing is the practice of gathering information using public input and collaboration. Threat intelligence platforms use crowdsourcing to collect information from the global cybersecurity community. Traditionally, an organization’s response to incidents was performed in isolation. A security team would receive and analyze an alert, and then work to remediate it without additional insights on how to approach it. Without crowdsourcing, attackers can perform the same attacks against multiple organizations.
With crowdsourcing, organizations harness the knowledge of millions of other cybersecurity professionals, including cybersecurity product vendors, government agencies, cloud providers, and more. Crowdsourcing allows people and organizations from the global cybersecurity community to openly share and access a collection of threat intelligence data, which helps to continuously improve detection technologies and methodologies.
Examples of information-sharing organizations include Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs), which focus on collecting and sharing sector-specific threat intelligence to companies within specific industries like energy, healthcare, and others. Open-source intelligence (OSINT) is the collection and analysis of information from publicly available sources to generate usable intelligence. OSINT can also be used as a method to gather information related to threat actors, threats, vulnerabilities, and more.
This threat intelligence data is used to improve the detection methods and techniques of security products, like detection tools or anti-virus software. For example, attackers often perform the same attacks on multiple targets with the hope that one of them will be successful. Once an organization detects an attack, they can immediately publish the attack details, such as malicious files, IP addresses, or URLs, to tools like VirusTotal. This threat intelligence can then help other organizations defend against the same attack.
VirusTotal
VirusTotal is a service that allows anyone to analyze suspicious files, domains, URLs, and IP addresses for malicious content. VirusTotal also offers additional services and tools for enterprise use. This reading focuses on the VirusTotal website, which is available for free and non-commercial use.
It can be used to analyze suspicious files, IP addresses, domains, and URLs to detect cybersecurity threats such as malware. Users can submit and check artifacts, like file hashes or IP addresses, to get VirusTotal reports, which provide additional information on whether an IoC is considered malicious or not, how that IoC is connected or related to other IoCs in the dataset, and more.
Here is a breakdown of the reports summary:
- Detection: The Detection tab provides a list of third-party security vendors and their detection verdicts on an IoC. For example, vendors can list their detection verdict as malicious, suspicious, unsafe, and more.
- Details: The Details tab provides additional information extracted from a static analysis of the IoC. Information such as different hashes, file types, file sizes, headers, creation time, and first and last submission information can all be found in this tab.
- Relations: The Relations tab provides related IoCs that are somehow connected to an artifact, such as contacted URLs, domains, IP addresses, and dropped files if the artifact is an executable.
- Behavior: The Behavior tab contains information related to the observed activity and behaviors of an artifact after executing it in a controlled or sandboxed environment. This information includes tactics and techniques detected, network communications, registry and file systems actions, processes, and more.
- Community: The Community tab is where members of the VirusTotal community, such as security professionals or researchers, can leave comments and insights about the IoC.
- Vendors’ ratio and community score: The score displayed at the top of the report is the vendors’ ratio. The vendors’ ratio shows how many security vendors have flagged the IoC as malicious overall. Below this score, there is also the community score, based on the inputs of the VirusTotal community. The more detections a file has and the higher its community score is, the more likely that the file is malicious.
Note: Data uploaded to VirusTotal will be publicly shared with the entire VirusTotal community. Be careful of what you submit, and make sure you do not upload personal information.
Other tools
There are other investigative tools that can be used to analyze IoCs. These tools can also share the data that’s uploaded to them to the security community.
Jotti malware scan
Jotti’s malware scan is a free service that lets you scan suspicious files with several antivirus programs. There are some limitations to the number of files that you can submit.
Urlscan.io
Urlscan.io is a free service that scans and analyzes URLs and provides a detailed report summarizing the URL information.
CAPE Sandbox
CAPE Sandbox is an open source service used to automate the analysis of suspicious files. Using an isolated environment, malicious files such as malware are analyzed and a comprehensive report outlines the malware behavior.
MalwareBazaar
MalwareBazaar is a free repository for malware samples. Malware samples are a great source of threat intelligence that can be used for research purposes.
Key takeaways
As a security analyst, you’ll analyze IoCs. It’s important to understand how adding context to investigations can help improve detection capabilities and make informed and effective decisions.
Practice Quiz: Activity: Investigate a suspicious file hash
Reading: Activity Exemplar: Investigate a suspicious file hash
Reading
Completed Exemplar
To review the exemplar for this course item, click the link below and select Use Template.
Link to exemplar: Investigation findings
Assessment of Exemplar
Compare the exemplar to your completed activity. Review your work using each of the criteria in the exemplar. What did you do well? Where can you improve? Use your answers to these questions to guide you as you continue to progress through the course.
Note: The exemplar represents one of many possible ways to complete this activity. Yours will likely differ depending on which IoCs you have identified and listed. What’s important is that your activity captures some details of the file hash investigation including related IoCs and verification of the file as malicious.
Step 1: The exemplar provides a clear and brief summary of the file hash by using the information found under the Detection tab. The Community Score and the Security vendors’ analysis listed in the VirusTotal report provide insight into the file. Over fifty security vendors have flagged this file as malicious. Additionally, multiple vendors have categorized the file as Flagpro malware, a well-known malware used by advanced threat actors.
Step 2: The exemplar also identifies different types of IoCs using the VirusTotal report. While the exemplar provides an example for each field in the pyramid, your activity only has to include three IoC examples. Using the information found in the Details, Relations, and Behavior tabs, you’ll be able to find additional IoCs that are related to the file such as: a domain names, IP addresses, hash values, network or host artifacts, tools, and tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).
- Domain names: org.misecure.com is reported as a malicious contacted domain under the Relations tab in the VirusTotal report.
- IP address: 207.148.109.242 is listed as one of many IP addresses under the Relations tab in the VirusTotal report. This IP address is also associated with the org.misecure.com domain as listed in the DNS Resolutions section under the Behavior tab from the Zenbox sandbox report.
- Hash value: 287d612e29b71c90aa54947313810a25 is a MD5 hash listed under the Details tab in the VirusTotal report.
- Network/host artifacts: Network-related artifacts that have been observed in this malware are HTTP requests made to the org.misecure.com domain. This is listed in the Network Communications section under the Behavior tab from the Venus Eye Sandbox and Rising MOVES sandbox reports.
- Tools: Input capture is listed in the Collection section under the Behavior tab from the Zenbox sandbox report. Malicious actors use input capture to steal user input such as passwords, credit card numbers, and other sensitive information.
- TTPs: Command and control is listed as a tactic under the Behavior tab from the Zenbox sandbox report. Malicious actors use command and control to establish communication channels between an infected system and their own system.
Key takeaways
In this activity, you determined that a file was malicious using information from a VirusTotal report. You also identified additional indicators of compromise that are associated with this file. As a security analyst, you will use investigative tools like VirusTotal to access threat intelligence from the global cybersecurity community. This helps you add context to investigations and learn more about threats when investigating a possible security incident.
Practice Quiz: Test your knowledge: Incident detection and verification
Do detection tools have limitations in their detection capabilities?
Yes
Detection tools have limitations in their detection capabilities. Detection tools are an important part of incident detection and response, but they cannot detect everything. Additional methods of detection can be used to improve coverage and accuracy.
AI
Yes, detection tools have limitations in their detection capabilities. Here are some of the main limitations:
1. Incomplete Detection:
- Evolving Threats: Attackers constantly develop new and sophisticated techniques that can evade detection tools. These tools rely on signatures and patterns to identify threats, but new threats may not yet be in their databases.
- Limited Resources: Detection tools, especially advanced ones, can be resource-intensive. Organizations may not have the resources to deploy and maintain these tools throughout their entire network.
- Misconfigurations: Detection tools that are not properly configured can generate false positives (alerts for non-existent threats) or miss real threats.
2. High Alert Volume:
- False Positives: As mentioned above, misconfigured tools can generate a high volume of false alarms, making it difficult to identify real threats.
- Unknown Events: Even well-configured tools may generate alerts for events that are not yet understood, causing analysts to waste time investigating non-issues.
- Alert Fatigue: Security analysts can become overwhelmed by the sheer number of alerts, leading to alert fatigue and a decreased ability to identify real threats.
3. Limited Scope:
- Focus on Specific Threats: Most detection tools are designed to detect specific types of threats, such as malware or network intrusions. This means that they may be blind to other types of threats, such as insider attacks or social engineering.
- Limited Visibility: Some detection tools may only have visibility into certain parts of the network, leaving other areas vulnerable.
4. Human Factors:
- Skill and Training: The effectiveness of detection tools depends on the skill and training of the analysts who use them. Inexperienced analysts may misinterpret alerts or fail to investigate them properly.
- Decision Fatigue: Similar to alert fatigue, analysts can also experience decision fatigue, making them more likely to make mistakes when analyzing alerts.
5. Evasion Techniques:
- Obfuscation: Attackers can use techniques to hide their malicious activity from detection tools. This can include encrypting data, using zero-day exploits, or mimicking legitimate traffic.
- Advanced Techniques: More sophisticated attackers may use techniques that are specifically designed to bypass detection tools, such as fileless malware or social engineering attacks.
Despite these limitations, detection tools are still an important part of any security strategy. By understanding the limitations of these tools, organizations can take steps to mitigate them and improve their overall security posture.
Here are some additional tips for improving the effectiveness of detection tools:
- Use a layered security approach: Detection tools should be used in conjunction with other security controls, such as firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, and endpoint protection.
- Keep your tools up to date: Detection tools are constantly being updated with new signatures and threat intelligence. It is important to keep your tools up to date to ensure that they are effective against the latest threats.
- Train your analysts: Security analysts need to be trained on how to use detection tools effectively. This includes understanding how to interpret alerts, investigate incidents, and respond to threats.
- Monitor and adjust your tools: You should regularly monitor your detection tools to see how effective they are at identifying threats. You may need to adjust your tools or your configuration based on your findings.
By following these tips, you can help to ensure that your detection tools are as effective as possible in protecting your organization from cyberattacks.
Why do security analysts refine alert rules? Select two answers.
To reduce false positive alerts, To improve the accuracy of detection technologies
Security analysts refine alert rules to improve the accuracy of detection technologies and reduce false positive alerts. Rules are adjusted to match the activity intended to be detected.
AI
The correct answers are:
- To reduce false positive alerts: Refining alert rules helps eliminate notifications triggered by harmless activity or misconfigured settings, allowing analysts to focus on genuine threats.
- To improve the accuracy of detection technologies: Tuning rules based on actual incidents and attack patterns helps detection tools better recognize malicious behavior and reduce the possibility of missing real threats.
The other options are not the main purposes of refining alert rules:
- To create threat intelligence: While analyzing alerts can contribute to creating threat intelligence, the primary goal of refining rules is not the direct generation of intelligence.
- To increase alert volumes: Increasing alert volume would be counterproductive for analysts, making it harder to identify real threats amidst the noise.
Therefore, reducing false positives and improving detection accuracy are the primary objectives of refining alert rules in the context of security analysis.
Fill in the blank: _____ involves the investigation and validation of alerts.
Analysis
Analysis involves the investigation and validation of alerts.
AI
The correct answer is: Analysis
Explanation:
- Threat hunting involves proactively searching for threats within a network, not specifically focusing on validating existing alerts.
- Detection is the initial identification of potential threats, often through automated tools, but doesn’t necessarily involve the in-depth investigation and validation of those alerts.
- Honeypots are decoy systems designed to lure attackers and gather information about their tactics, not directly related to analyzing existing alerts.
Therefore, Analysis best fits the blank as it describes the process of thoroughly investigating and validating alerts generated by detection tools or other sources. This involves examining logs, network traffic, infected files, and other evidence to determine if there is a genuine security incident and what actions need to be taken.
What are some causes of high alert volumes? Select two answers.
Broad detection rules, Misconfigured alert settings
Misconfigured alert settings and broad detection rules are some causes of high alert volumes.
AI
The correct answers are:
- Broad detection rules: When detection rules are too generic, they can generate a high number of alerts for both legitimate and potentially malicious activity. This can overwhelm analysts and make it difficult to distinguish real threats.
- Misconfigured alert settings: Incorrect configuration of alert thresholds or sensitivity levels can also lead to excessive alerts, even for harmless events.
The other options are less likely to contribute to high alert volumes:
- Refined detection rules: Rules that are carefully tuned to identify specific threats are more likely to reduce false positives and generate fewer, more relevant alerts.
- Sophisticated evasion techniques: While advanced attackers may use techniques to evade detection, those techniques would typically result in fewer alerts, not a higher volume.
Therefore, broad detection rules and misconfigured alert settings are primary causes of high alert volumes, which can negatively impact the efficiency of security analysis.
Create and use documentation
Video: The benefits of documentation
Key Points:
- Scalability: Proper documentation allows security teams to grow beyond a handful of analysts by providing readily accessible information.
- Transparency: It serves as a reliable record of events and actions, crucial for legal and insurance purposes.
- Standardization: Documentation establishes consistent policies, processes, and procedures for improved quality and efficiency.
- Clarity: Effective guides and playbooks offer clear instructions and minimize confusion during incident response.
- Adaptability: Regularly updated documentation ensures alignment with evolving threats and regulations.
- Personal Recall: Documenting your actions improves your own memory and facilitates identifying potential gaps in past responses.
- Organizational Value: Well-maintained documentation is an invaluable asset for the entire security team and the organization overall.
Overall:
While writing documentation might seem like an additional chore, its benefits for security teams are undeniable. From enabling scalability and ensuring transparency to promoting clarity and adaptability, documenting your actions and procedures ultimately strengthens your organization’s security posture.
The world of cybersecurity is a high-stakes battleground, constantly evolving against ever-sophisticated threats. In this fierce landscape, one often-overlooked weapon holds immense power: documentation.
While it might seem mundane compared to firewalls and intrusion detection systems, effective documentation is a cornerstone of robust cybersecurity. It’s not just about scribbling notes; it’s about building a structured knowledge base that empowers your team and safeguards your organization.
Let’s explore the crucial benefits of documentation in cybersecurity:
**1. ** Scalability: Imagine relying solely on the tribal knowledge of a single security analyst. What happens when they leave? Documentation breaks down siloed knowledge, enabling new team members to quickly onboard and become effective, regardless of their experience level.
**2. ** Transparency: When an incident strikes, every second counts. Clear, step-by-step documentation ensures transparency in your response efforts. Think of it as a reliable trail of breadcrumbs, paving the way for accountability and providing evidence for insurance claims or legal proceedings.
**3. ** Standardization: Documentation isn’t just about recording what you do; it’s about defining how you do it. By establishing standardized policies, procedures, and best practices, you ensure consistency and quality across your security operations. This, in turn, minimizes human error and reduces the risk of vulnerabilities.
**4. ** Clarity: Let’s face it, cybersecurity can be complex. Well-written documentation translates technical jargon into actionable steps, eliminating confusion and uncertainty for your team. Think of it as a roadmap that guides everyone in the right direction, from security analysts to incident responders.
**5. ** Adaptability: The security landscape is constantly shifting. New threats emerge, regulations change, and tools evolve. Regularly updated documentation ensures your team stays ahead of the curve, adapting to new challenges and evolving best practices.
**6. ** Personal Recall: Documenting your actions isn’t just about sharing knowledge; it’s about strengthening your own memory and learning from past experiences. When you revisit your notes, you may uncover overlooked details or identify gaps in your response strategies.
Remember, cybersecurity is a team effort. By investing in well-structured documentation, you empower your team, promote transparency, and elevate your organization’s overall security posture. Don’t underestimate the power of the written word – make documentation your ally in the fight against cyber threats.
Take action today:
- Identify key areas of your security operations that require documentation.
- Establish clear formatting and organization guidelines for your documentation.
- Schedule regular review and update sessions to keep your documentation relevant.
- Encourage team members to actively contribute to and utilize your documentation.
By embracing the power of documentation, you can build a resilient cybersecurity ecosystem that thrives in the face of ever-present challenges.
What are the benefits of documentation? Select three answers.
Transparency, Clarity, Standardization
The benefits of documentation are transparency, standardization, and clarity. Documentation is any form of recorded content that is used for a specific purpose. Standardization provides an established set of guidelines or standards that members of an organization can follow to complete a task or workflow.SkipContinue
You may recall our discussion on
the different documentation tools and types used by security teams
when responding to incidents. In this video, we’ll examine the benefits
that documentation offers, so that you can better understand how to leverage
documentation as a security professional. As a security engineer who has developed
a great deal of detection rules, it was critical for me to document what
it means when those rules are activated, what severity to assign,
what might lead to false positives, and how the analysts can confirm
the alert is legitimate. Without this documentation, a security operations team can never
scale beyond one or two analysts. If something was documented,
then there’s a record of it happening. This means that relevant
information can be accessed. This is known as transparency. Transparent documentation is useful as a
source of evidence for security insurance claims, regulatory investigations,
and legal proceedings. You’ll learn more about
documentation processes that help to achieve this in
an upcoming section. Documentation also
provides standardization. This means that there’s
an established set of guidelines or standards that members of an organization
can follow to complete a task or workflow. An example of creating standardization
through documentation is establishing an organization’s security
policy, processes, and procedures. This helps in maintaining quality of work
since there are set rules to follow. Documentation also improves clarity.
Effective documentation not only gives team members a clear understanding
of their roles and duties, but it also provides information
on how to get the job done. For example, playbooks that provide
detailed instructions prevent uncertainty and confusion during incident response. The security field is constantly changing,
attacks evolve, and regulatory requirements might change. This is why it’s important to maintain,
review, and update documentation regularly
to keep up with any changes. As a security professional, you’ll likely
juggle documentation responsibilities alongside your other tasks. By taking the time to write down your
actions, you’ll recall facts and information. You may even notice some gaps in
the previous actions you took. The time you spend documenting is
valuable not only for you, but for your entire organization.
Video: Document evidence with chain of custody forms
- Chain of custody documents track evidence handling during an incident to ensure its transparency and integrity for legal proceedings.
- Each transfer of evidence is logged with details like date, time, purpose, and person responsible.
- Hash functions verify data hasn’t been tampered with.
- Missing entries or errors break the chain and can make evidence inadmissible in court.
- Chain of custody helps hold malicious actors accountable.
Additional notes:
- The example with the hard drive illustrates the process flow from collection to analysis.
- No standard format exists for chain of custody forms, but common elements are described.
- Broken chains can impact evidence validity and its use in court.
In the high-stakes world of cybersecurity, evidence is king. When an incident strikes, collecting and preserving data is crucial to understanding what happened, identifying the culprit, and taking appropriate action. But how do you ensure the integrity and admissibility of that evidence? That’s where chain of custody forms come in.
Chain of custody is the documented trail of evidence handling, from the moment it’s collected to its presentation in court. It’s a paper trail that builds trust and transparency, ensuring that the evidence hasn’t been tampered with and remains reliable for legal purposes.
Why are chain of custody forms important?
- Trust and transparency: They create a clear record of who handled the evidence, when, and why. This builds trust in the investigation and strengthens your case.
- Admissibility in court: Courts require evidence to have a clear chain of custody to be considered admissible. Broken chains can jeopardize your entire case.
- Legal requirements: Some industries and regulations have specific chain of custody requirements that must be met.
Let’s break down the key elements of a chain of custody form:
- Evidence description: This includes details like the type of evidence (e.g., hard drive, log file), location, serial number, and any unique identifiers.
- Custody log: This table lists everyone who handled the evidence, their role, date and time of transfer, and the purpose of the transfer.
- Signatures: Each person who handles the evidence should sign and date the form, confirming their role and responsibility.
- Hashing: For digital evidence, generating a cryptographic hash (a unique digital fingerprint) before and after each transfer helps verify data integrity.
Here’s how you can use chain of custody forms effectively:
- Prepare in advance: Have blank forms readily available for any incident.
- Document everything: Log every transfer of evidence, even within your team.
- Use secure storage: Keep physical evidence in a secure location and digital evidence on encrypted drives.
- Maintain consistent procedures: Train your team on proper evidence handling and chain of custody documentation.
Remember, chain of custody is an ongoing process. It starts the moment you suspect an incident and continues until the evidence is no longer needed. By following these best practices and utilizing chain of custody forms, you can ensure your evidence is secure, reliable, and ready to stand up in court.
Bonus tips:
- Use digital chain of custody software for easier management and tamper-proof documentation.
- Consider witness statements and photographs to further strengthen your case.
- Regularly review and update your chain of custody procedures to ensure they’re effective.
By building a strong chain of custody, you can turn evidence into a powerful tool for protecting your organization and holding malicious actors accountable.
Let’s continue our discussion on how
documentation provides transparency through documents like chain of custody. During incident response,
evidence must be accounted for during the entire incident’s lifecycle. Tracking evidence is important if the
evidence is requested as part of any legal proceedings. How can security teams
ensure that this is done? They use a form called chain of custody. Chain of custody is the process of
documenting evidence possession and control during an incident lifecycle. As soon as evidence gets collected,
chain of custody forms are introduced. The forms should be filled out with
details as the evidence is handled. Let’s examine a very simple example of
how chain of custody is used during digital forensic analysis. Previously, you learned that digital
forensics is the practice of collecting and analyzing data to determine
what has happened after an attack. During an incident response, Aisha
verified that a compromised hard drive requires examination
by the forensics team. First, she ensures that the hard
drive is write protected, so the data on the disk can’t be edited or
erased. Then, she calculates and records a cryptographic hash function
of an image of the hard drive. Remember that a hash function is
an algorithm that produces a code that can’t be decrypted. Aisha is then instructed to transfer it to
Colin in the forensics department. Colin examines it and
sends it off to Nav, another analyst. Nav receives the compromised hard drive
and sends it to her manager, Arman. Each time the hard drive is transferred
to another person, they need to log it in the chain of custody form, so that movement of
evidence is transparent. Tampering with the data on the hard drive
can be detected using the original hash that Aisha documented at
the beginning of the process. This ensures that there’s a paper trail
describing who handled the evidence, and why, when, and where they handled it. Just like other documentation types, there is no standard template of what the
chain of custody form should look like, but they do contain common elements. This is what you might examine
on a chain of custody log form. First, there should be a description of the
evidence, which includes any identifying information, like the location,
hostname, MAC address, or IP address. Next is the custody log, which details
the name of the people who transferred and received the evidence. It also includes the date and time the
evidence was collected or transferred and the purpose of the transfer. You may be wondering: what happens if
evidence gets logged incorrectly? Or, if there’s a missing entry? This is what’s known as a broken chain
of custody, which occurs when there are inconsistencies in the collection and logging of evidence in
the chain of custody. In the court of law, chain
of custody documents help establish proof of the integrity,
reliability, and accuracy of the evidence. For evidence related to security incidents,
chain of custody forms are used to help meet legal standards so that this evidence can be used in
legal proceedings. If a malicious actor compromised a system, evidence must be
available to determine their actions so that appropriate legal
action can be taken. However, in some cases,
major breaks in the chain of custody can impact the integrity, reliability, and
accuracy of the evidence. This affects whether or not the evidence
can be a trusted source of information and used in the court of law. Chain of custody forms provide us with
a method of maintaining evidence, so that malicious actors can be held
responsible for their actions.
Reading: Best practices for effective documentation
Reading
Documentation is any form of recorded content that is used for a specific purpose, and it is essential in the field of security. Security teams use documentation to support investigations, complete tasks, and communicate findings. This reading explores the benefits of documentation and provides you with a list of common practices to help you create effective documentation in your security career.
Documentation benefits
You’ve already learned about many types of security documentation, including playbooks, final reports, and more. As you’ve also learned, effective documentation has three benefits:
- Transparency
- Standardization
- Clarity
Transparency
In security, transparency is critical for demonstrating compliance with regulations and internal processes, meeting insurance requirements, and for legal proceedings. Chain of custody is the process of documenting evidence possession and control during an incident lifecycle. Chain of custody is an example of how documentation produces transparency and an audit trail.
Standardization
Standardization through repeatable processes and procedures supports continuous improvement efforts, helps with knowledge transfer, and facilitates the onboarding of new team members. Standards are references that inform how to set policies.
You have learned how NIST provides various security frameworks that are used to improve security measures. Likewise, organizations set up their own standards to meet their business needs. An example of documentation that establishes standardization is an incident response plan, which is a document that outlines the procedures to take in each step of incident response. Incident response plans standardize an organization’s response process by outlining procedures in advance of an incident. By documenting an organization’s incident response plan, you create a standard that people follow, maintaining consistency with repeatable processes and procedures.
Clarity
Ideally, all documentation provides clarity to its audience. Clear documentation helps people quickly access the information they need so they can take necessary action. Security analysts are required to document the reasoning behind any action they take so that it’s clear to their team why an alert was escalated or closed.
Best practices
As a security professional, you’ll need to apply documentation best practices in your career. Here are some general guidelines to remember:
Know your audience
Before you start creating documentation, consider your audience and their needs. For instance, an incident summary written for a security operations center (SOC) manager will be written differently than one that’s drafted for a chief executive officer (CEO). The SOC manager can understand technical security language but a CEO might not. Tailor your document to meet your audience’s needs.
Be concise
You might be tasked with creating long documentation, such as a report. But when documentation is too long, people can be discouraged from using it. To ensure that your documentation is useful, establish the purpose immediately. This helps people quickly identify the objective of the document. For example, executive summaries outline the major facts of an incident at the beginning of a final report. This summary should be brief so that it can be easily skimmed to identify the key findings.
Update regularly
In security, new vulnerabilities are discovered and exploited constantly. Documentation must be regularly reviewed and updated to keep up with the evolving threat landscape. For example, after an incident has been resolved, a comprehensive review of the incident can identify gaps in processes and procedures that require changes and updates. By regularly updating documentation, security teams stay well informed and incident response plans stay updated.
Key takeaways
Effective documentation produces benefits for everyone in an organization. Knowing how to create documentation is an essential skill to have as a security analyst. As you continue in your journey to become a security professional, be sure to consider these practices for creating effective documentation.
Video: The value of cybersecurity playbooks
Key Points:
- Playbooks are manuals for incident response, similar to travel itineraries for trips.
- They provide clear instructions on what to do during various security incidents, reducing chaos and uncertainty.
- Playbooks can:
- Outline steps for specific attacks like ransomware, data breaches, and DDoS.
- Use flowcharts for visual flow of response actions.
- Include checklists to ensure thoroughness and reduce stress.
- Different types of playbooks exist:
- Non-automated: Require manual execution by analysts (DDoS detection example).
- Automated: Use tools to execute specific tasks (severity categorization, evidence gathering).
- Semi-automated: Combine manual and automated tasks for optimal efficiency.
- Playbooks need regular updates to reflect evolving threats and ensure effectiveness.
- Post-incident review is a good time to identify needed updates and implement changes.
Overall:
Playbooks are crucial for effective and swift incident response in cybersecurity. They offer structure, guidance, and efficiency, enabling security teams to act quickly and decisively against different threats.
Imagine a raging cyberattack, data swirling like storm clouds, anxieties rising like the tide. In this digital tempest, cybersecurity playbooks become your anchor, your compass, your lighthouse. Let’s explore why these seemingly simple manuals hold immense value in the high-stakes world of cybersecurity.
A Roadmap in the Chaos:
Incident response can be a whirlwind of adrenaline and confusion. Playbooks provide a structured roadmap, outlining the steps to take when specific threats lash out. Think of them as pre-charted courses, guiding your team through the storm with clear instructions and defined priorities.
Reduced Uncertainty, Increased Confidence:
Uncertainty breeds hesitation, hindering response times. Playbooks eliminate guesswork by providing step-by-step directions for various scenarios. This empowers your team to act decisively and confidently, even under pressure, minimizing costly delays and maximizing their effectiveness.
Efficiency in the Eye of the Storm:
Playbooks can automate routine tasks, freeing up your analysts to focus on critical thinking and strategic decisions. Imagine automated evidence gathering or incident categorization – precious time saved from tedious tasks can be channeled towards rapid containment and mitigation.
Scalability: Sharing the Knowledge:
With playbooks, expertise becomes transferable. New team members can quickly onboard and become valuable contributors, armed with the same knowledge and strategies as seasoned veterans. This ensures consistent quality and maintains your security posture even with personnel changes.
Adaptability in Ever-Changing Seas:
Cyber threats evolve like chameleons. Playbooks need to adapt. By regularly reviewing and updating your playbooks based on new threats and incident experiences, you stay ahead of the curve, constantly refining your response strategies for maximum effectiveness.
Lessons Learned from the Aftermath:
Post-incident analysis is invaluable. Use this opportunity to identify gaps or inaccuracies in your existing playbooks. Update them with newfound insights, ensuring future responses are even more swift and impactful.
Building a Culture of Preparedness:
Playbooks are more than just manuals; they’re training tools and rallying points. Regularly using and revisiting them instills a culture of preparedness within your team, fostering confidence and readiness for the next cyber storm.
From Paper to Power:
Remember, playbooks are only as valuable as their use. Integrate them seamlessly into your incident response protocols. Train your team, conduct simulations, and make sure everyone understands their role in the grand scheme of response.
In Conclusion:
In the turbulent waters of cybersecurity, playbooks are not just helpful – they’re essential. They offer clarity, efficiency, and adaptability, empowering your team to navigate even the most ferocious cyber storms with confidence and strength. Invest in playbooks, refine them, and watch your cyber resilience rise like a beacon in the face of any digital threat.
Have you ever taken a trip to a place you’ve never
visited before? You may have used
a travel itinerary to plan your trip activities. Travel itineraries are
essential documents to have, especially for travel
to a new place. They help keep you
organized and give you a clear picture
of your travel plans. They detail the
activities you’ll do, the places you’ll visit, and your travel time
between destinations. Playbooks are similar
to travel itineraries. As you may remember from
our previous discussions, a playbook is a
manual that provides details about any
operational action. They provide security
analysts with instructions on exactly what to do
when an incident occurs. Playbooks provide
security professionals with a clear picture of their tasks during the entire incident
response life cycle. Responding to an incident can be unpredictable and
chaotic at times. Security teams are expected to act quickly and effectively. Playbooks offer structure and order during this
time by clearly outlining the actions to take when responding to a
specific incident. By following a playbook, security teams can
reduce any guesswork and uncertainty during
response times. This allows security
teams to act quickly and without
any hesitation. Without playbooks, an
effective and swift response to an incident is
nearly impossible. Within playbooks, there
may be checklists that can also help
security teams perform effectively during stressful
times by helping them remember to complete
each step in the incident
response life cycle. Playbooks outline the
steps that are necessary in response to an
attack like ransomware, data breach, malware, or DDoS. Here’s an example
of a playbook that uses a flowchart diagram with the steps to take during the detection of a DDoS attack. This depicts the process
for detecting a DDoS and begins with determining
the indicators of compromise, like unknown incoming traffic. Once the indicators of
compromise are determined, the next step is to collect the logs and finally
analyze the evidence. There are three different
types of playbooks: non-automated, automated,
or semi-automated. The DDoS playbook
we just explored is an example of a
non-automated playbook, which requires
step-by-step actions performed by an analyst. Automated playbooks
automate tasks in incident response
processes. For example, tasks such as categorizing
the severity of the incident or
gathering evidence can be done using an
automated playbook. Automated playbooks
can help lower the time to resolution
during an incident. SOAR and SIEM tools can be configured to
automate playbooks. Finally, semi-automated
playbooks combine a person’s
action with automation. Tedious, error-prone, or time-consuming tasks
can be automated, while analysts can prioritize their time with other tasks. Semi-automated
playbooks can help increase productivity and
decrease time to resolution. As a security team
responds to incidents, they may discover
that a playbook needs updates or changes. Threats are constantly evolving and for playbooks
to be effective, they must be maintained
and updated regularly. A great time to introduce
changes to playbooks is during the post-incident
activity phase. We’ll be exploring more
about this phase in an upcoming section.
Meet you there.
Practice Quiz: Activity: Use a playbook to respond to a phishing incident
Reading: Activity Exemplar: Use a playbook to respond to a phishing incident
Reading
Completed Exemplar
To review the exemplar for this course item, click the link and select Use Template.
Link to exemplar: Completed alert ticket
Assessment of Exemplar
Compare the exemplar to your completed activity. Review your work using each of the criteria in the exemplar. What did you do well? Where can you improve? Use your answers to these questions to guide you as you continue to progress through the course.
Note: The exemplar represents one of many possible ways to complete this activity. Yours will likely differ in certain ways. What’s important is that your activity describes the relevant alert details you found during the activity and the reasons that you are escalating or closing the alert ticket.
The exemplar uses details from the given scenario and includes the following:
- An updated Alert ticket status
- In the Ticket comments section, a sentence summarizing the alert
- In the Ticket comments section, 5 reasons describing why the decision was made to escalate the ticket. The reasons are supported by referencing specific details from the alert ticket.
Response and recovery
Video: The role of triage in incident response
Problem: Security analysts face a flood of alerts daily, needing efficient management.
Solution: Triage, similar to hospital emergency room procedures, prioritizes alerts based on:
- Urgency: Threat level to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems.
- Example: Ransomware attack with data encryption takes precedence over employee phishing email.
Triage Process:
- Receive & Assess: Identify genuine incidents and prioritize them based on severity.
- Investigate & Analyze: Gather evidence like system logs to understand the incident.
- Contextualize: Ask questions to avoid assumptions and clarify the situation (e.g., suspicious log activity, login location/time).
Next Steps: Learn incident response and recovery procedures to effectively handle security threats.
Key Takeaways:
- Triage helps optimize resource allocation for critical incidents.
- Thorough investigation with context-building questions leads to well-informed decisions.
Imagine a cyberattack hitting your network, alarms blaring like sirens, data swirling like storm clouds. In this digital tempest, proper triage becomes your anchor, your compass, your beacon. Let’s explore why this seemingly simple process is the cornerstone of effective incident response in cybersecurity.
Triage: Prioritizing the Chaos:
In the face of a cyberattack, you’re bombarded with alerts – a deluge of potential threats vying for your attention. Triage cuts through the noise, helping you prioritize and allocate resources efficiently. It’s akin to sorting patients in an emergency room, ensuring the most critical cases receive immediate attention.
The Pillars of Triage:
- Urgency: Assessing the threat level is paramount. A ransomware attack encrypting data demands immediate action, while a suspicious email might warrant less urgency.
- Impact: Consider the potential damage to your systems, data, and reputation. A data breach exposes sensitive information, while a DDoS attack might disrupt operations.
- Likelihood: Not all alerts represent genuine threats. False positives waste precious time and resources. Triage helps separate the real from the red herrings.
The Triage Workflow:
- Gather Data: Collect information from alerts, logs, and affected systems to build a holistic picture of the incident.
- Analyze: Assess the data against your organization’s security policies and threat intelligence to determine severity and potential impact.
- Prioritize: Assign urgency levels based on your analysis, ensuring critical incidents receive immediate attention.
- Communicate: Keep stakeholders informed about the situation, prioritizing transparency and clear communication.
Beyond Prioritization:
Triage isn’t just about ranking threats; it’s also about initiating containment measures to minimize damage. This might involve isolating affected systems, disabling compromised accounts, or deploying security tools.
Remember:
- Time is of the essence: Every minute wasted can widen the attack window and increase potential damage.
- Context is key: Don’t jump to conclusions; build a clear understanding of the incident through thorough investigation.
- Adapt and evolve: No two incidents are identical. Be prepared to adjust your triage process based on the specific threat and situation.
Building a Culture of Triage:
Effective triage requires not just tools and processes, but a trained and prepared team. Regularly conduct simulations and training exercises to ensure your team can confidently navigate the storm of an attack.
Triage is the foundation of successful incident response. By mastering this vital skill, you equip yourself and your team to weather any digital storm, protecting your organization’s critical assets and emerging stronger from the chaos.
So, hone your triage skills, build a resilient team, and remember – in the face of cyber threats, preparedness is your greatest weapon.
As you’ve learned,
security analysts can be flooded with a large amount
of alerts on any given day. How does an analyst manage
all of these alerts? Hospital emergency
departments receive a large number of
patients every day. Each patient needs medical
care for a different reason, but not all patients will receive medical
care immediately. This is because hospitals have a limited
number of resources available and must manage their time and
energy efficiently. They do this through a
process known as triage. In medicine, triage
is used to categorize patients based on the
urgency of their conditions. For example, patients with a
life-threatening condition such as a heart attack will receive immediate
medical attention, but a patient with a non-life
threatening condition like a broken finger may have to wait before they see a doctor. Triage helps to manage limited resources so
that hospital staff can give immediate attention to patients with the most
urgent conditions. Triage is also used in security. Before an alert gets escalated, it goes through a triage
process, which prioritizes incidents according
to their level of importance or urgency. Similar to hospital
emergency departments, security teams have
limited resources available to dedicate
to incident response. Not all incidents are the same, and some may involve an
urgent response. Incidents are
triaged according to the threat they pose to
the confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of systems. For example, an
incident involving ransomware requires
immediate response. This is because ransomware
may cause financial, reputational, and
operational damage. Ransomware is a
higher priority than an incident like an employee
receiving a phishing email. When does triage happen? Once an incident is
detected and an alert gets sent out, triage begins. As a security analyst, you’ll identify the
different types of alerts, and then prioritize them
according to urgency. The triage process
generally looks like this. First, you’ll receive and assess the alert to
determine if it’s a false positive and whether it’s related to an existing incident. If it’s a true positive, you’ll assign priority
on the alert based on the organization’s
policy and guidelines. The priority level defines how the organization’s security team will respond to the incident. Finally, you’ll
investigate the alert and collect and
analyze any evidence associated with the alert,
such as system logs. As an analyst, you’ll want
to ensure that you complete a thorough analysis
so that you have enough information to make an informed decision
about your findings. For example, say
that you received an alert for a failed
user login attempt. You’ll need to add context to your investigation to
determine if it’s malicious. You can do so by
asking questions. Is there anything out of the ordinary associated
with this alert? Are there multiple
failed login attempts? Did the login happen outside
of normal working hours? Did the login happen
outside of the network? These questions paint a
picture around the incident. By adding context, you avoid making assumptions,
which can result in incomplete or
incorrect conclusions. Now that we’ve covered
how to triage alerts, we’re ready to discuss
how to respond and recover from an
incident. Let’s go!
Video: Robin: Foster cross-team collaboration
Key Points:
- Teamwork is the core skill: Solving complex cyber threats requires diverse perspectives, problem-solving skills, and knowledge. Collaborating effectively is essential.
- Open information sharing: Unreservedly sharing information, especially during confusing incident responses, leads to the fastest and best solutions.
- Real-world example: Robin shares a significant incident where global teamwork resolved a major vulnerability, strengthened bonds, and improved future collaboration.
- Don’t give up: Cybersecurity can be challenging, but perseverance and continuous learning lead to a rewarding career.
Overall message:
In cybersecurity, success hinges on collaborative problem-solving and open communication within a strong team. Embrace the challenges, learn from your experiences, and enjoy the journey of a fulfilling career.
[MUSIC] My name is Robin, and I am the program management lead for
the Red Team at Google. I would say teamwork might be
the most important skill for people who work in cybersecurity. The collaborative culture is to understand
that everybody brings a unique perspective and a useful perspective and
useful skills. What it is about teamwork is
that these problems are hard. These problems are complex.
The bad actors out there are smart, they’re well resourced, and
they’re really motivated. So they’re constantly coming up with
new ways to do the activities that they want to do. It takes people with all
kinds of perspectives, all kinds of problem solving skills,
all kinds of knowledge to come together to understand what has happened,
and how we can defend against it. When you’re working as part of a team, one
of the things to expect is that you should share information freely
with your colleagues and that they’ll share
information freely with you. At the beginning and in the confusing
part of responding to incidents, all information is useful. So expect to dive right in,
share everything you know and listen to the things
people around you say, so that we come out with the best
solutions as quickly as we can. Very soon after I got into
the role that I am in now, we experienced a very
significant incident. A vulnerability was discovered in
a library that was used in many, many different places on the Internet and
the vulnerability was significant. I was part of the team that came
together to respond to that, and that team that came together,
we set up response process that involved 24/7 coverage using our
colleagues all around the world. The end result of the amazing teamwork
that we experienced was, first of all, we were able to manage the vulnerability. But more importantly, it’s the way
the team came together afterward. And it’s the way people still talk about
how our great team work brought us closer to our colleagues, meant that our team works better
together than it did before, meant that these teamwork aspects,
they’re all things that we do so well now. We all feel like we’ve been
through something together and that we came out stronger
on the other side. As you go through the certificate, you might learn that cybersecurity is
tricky or it’s hard but don’t give up. The more you learn,
the more you’re going to enjoy it. So stay with it, learn everything you can,
and you’re going to have a great career.
Reading: The triage process
Reading
Previously, you learned that triaging is used to assess alerts and assign priority to incidents. In this reading, you’ll explore the triage process and its benefits. As a security analyst, you’ll be responsible for analyzing security alerts. Having the skills to effectively triage is important because it allows you to address and resolve security alerts efficiently.
Triage process
Incidents can have the potential to cause significant damage to an organization. Security teams must respond quickly and efficiently to prevent or limit the impact of an incident before it becomes too late. Triage is the prioritizing of incidents according to their level of importance or urgency. The triage process helps security teams evaluate and prioritize security alerts and allocate resources effectively so that the most critical issues are addressed first.
The triage process consists of three steps:
- Receive and assess
- Assign priority
- Collect and analyze
Receive and assess
During this first step of the triage process, a security analyst receives an alert from an alerting system like an intrusion detection system (IDS). You might recall that an IDS is an application that monitors system activity and alerts on possible intrusions. The analyst then reviews the alert to verify its validity and ensure they have a complete understanding of the alert.
This involves gathering as much information as possible about the alert, including details about the activity that triggered the alert, the systems and assets involved, and more. Here are some questions to consider when verifying the validity of an alert:
- Is the alert a false positive? Security analysts must determine whether the alert is a genuine security concern or a false positive, or an alert that incorrectly detects the presence of a threat.
- Was this alert triggered in the past? If so, how was it resolved? The history of an alert can help determine whether the alert is a new or recurring issue.
- Is the alert triggered by a known vulnerability? If an alert is triggered by a known vulnerability, security analysts can leverage existing knowledge to determine an appropriate response and minimize the impact of the vulnerability.
- What is the severity of the alert? The severity of an alert can help determine the priority of the response so that critical issues are quickly escalated.
Assign priority
Once the alert has been properly assessed and verified as a genuine security issue, it needs to be prioritized accordingly. Incidents differ in their impact, size, and scope, which affects the response efforts. To manage time and resources, security teams must prioritize how they respond to various incidents because not all incidents are equal. Here are some factors to consider when determining the priority of an incident:
- Functional impact: Security incidents that target information technology systems impact the service that these systems provide to its users. For example, a ransomware incident can severely impact the confidentiality, availability, and integrity of systems. Data can be encrypted or deleted, making it completely inaccessible to users. Consider how an incident impacts the existing business functionality of the affected system.
- Information impact: Incidents can affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of an organization’s data and information. In a data exfiltration attack, malicious actors can steal sensitive data. This data can belong to third party users or organizations. Consider the effects that information compromise can have beyond the organization.
- Recoverability: How an organization recovers from an incident depends on the size and scope of the incident and the amount of resources available. In some cases, recovery might not be possible, like when a malicious actor successfully steals proprietary data and shares it publicly. Spending time, effort, and resources on an incident with no recoverability can be wasteful. It’s important to consider whether recovery is possible and consider whether it’s worth the time and cost.
Note: Security alerts often come with an assigned priority or severity level that classifies the urgency of the alert based on a level of prioritization.
Collect and analyze
The final step of the triage process involves the security analyst performing a comprehensive analysis of the incident. Analysis involves gathering evidence from different sources, conducting external research, and documenting the investigative process. The goal of this step is to gather enough information to make an informed decision to address it. Depending on the severity of the incident, escalation to a level two analyst or a manager might be required. Level two analysts and managers might have more knowledge on using advanced techniques to address the incident.
Benefits of triage
By prioritizing incidents based on their potential impact, you can reduce the scope of impact to the organization by ensuring a timely response. Here are some benefits that triage has for security teams:
- Resource management: Triaging alerts allows security teams to focus their resources on threats that require urgent attention. This helps team members avoid dedicating time and resources to lower priority tasks and might also reduce response time.
- Standardized approach: Triage provides a standardized approach to incident handling. Process documentation, like playbooks, help to move alerts through an iterative process to ensure that alerts are properly assessed and validated. This ensures that only valid alerts are moved up to investigate.
Key takeaways
Triage allows security teams to prioritize incidents according to their level of importance or urgency. The triage process is important in ensuring that an organization meets their incident response goals. As a security professional, you will likely utilize triage to effectively respond to and resolve security incidents.
Video: The containment, eradication, and recovery phase of the lifecycle
This video covers the third phase of incident response, focusing on containment, eradication, and recovery.
Key Points:
- These steps are intertwined: Each step builds upon the previous one, with containment enabling eradication and ultimately supporting recovery.
- Integrates with NIST framework: This phase aligns with the Respond and Recover functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
- Containment: Aims to limit and prevent further damage after an incident. Strategies vary depending on the incident type, like isolating infected systems.
- Eradication: Focuses on removing all traces of the incident, involving vulnerability tests and patching related to the threat.
- Recovery: Brings affected systems back to normal operation, including reimaging, resetting passwords, and adjusting network configurations.
- Cyclical process: The incident response lifecycle can involve revisiting and iterating through previous phases based on new information or related incidents.
Next: The video will explore the final phase of the incident response lifecycle.
Imagine a digital fire outbreak within your network. Flames of malicious activity flicker across systems, threatening data and disrupting operations. Thankfully, you have a fire response plan – a well-defined strategy to extinguish the threat and restore normalcy. In the world of cybersecurity, this plan translates to the containment, eradication, and recovery (CER) phase of the incident response lifecycle.
Containment: Stopping the Spread
Think of containment as building a firebreak around the digital blaze. Its primary goal is to limit the damage by preventing the incident from spreading to other systems and causing further mayhem. This crucial step buys precious time for the eradication and recovery efforts to unfold.
Key Containment Strategies:
- Isolation: Quarantine infected systems or network segments to prevent lateral movement of the threat.
- Disabling Accounts: Block compromised accounts to cut off attacker access and prevent further unauthorized activity.
- Stopping Services: Halt potentially vulnerable services to minimize exposure and potential exploitation.
- Network Segmentation: Limit attacker reach by implementing temporary network segregation to compartmentalize affected areas.
Eradication: Extinguishing the Flames
With the fire contained, it’s time to extinguish it completely. Eradication focuses on eliminating all traces of the malicious activity from your systems. This thorough cleanup ensures the threat is neutralized and prevents future outbreaks.
Essential Eradication Steps:
- Malware Removal: Utilize antivirus and anti-malware tools to scan and remove malicious software.
- Vulnerability patching: Apply security patches to close exploited vulnerabilities and prevent future attacks.
- Forensic Analysis: Investigate the incident to understand the attacker’s methods, identify affected systems, and gather evidence for potential legal action.
- System Hardening: Strengthen system security configurations to mitigate future risks and make your network a less attractive target.
Recovery: Restoring Normalcy
Finally, it’s time to rebuild from the ashes. Recovery involves bringing affected systems and operations back online in a secure and stable manner. This phase ensures business continuity and minimizes the long-term impact of the incident.
Recovery Actions:
- System Restoration: Reimage affected systems from clean backups or rebuild them from scratch if necessary.
- Data Restoration: Restore lost or corrupted data from secure backups, ensuring data integrity and availability.
- Incident Response Report: Document the incident details, lessons learned, and corrective actions taken for future reference and improvement.
- Post-Incident Review: Conduct a thorough review of the incident to identify weaknesses in your security posture and implement preventive measures to avoid similar incidents in the future.
Remember:
- The CER phase is cyclical and iterative. You may need to revisit previous steps based on new information or discoveries during the eradication and recovery process.
- Incident response planning is crucial. Having a pre-defined plan with roles, responsibilities, and procedures in place ensures a faster and more effective response during an actual incident.
- Regular testing and training of your incident response plan are essential to ensure your team is prepared to handle real-world scenarios.
By mastering the art of containment, eradication, and recovery, you can transform your cybersecurity posture from reactive to proactive, turning digital firestorms into manageable incidents and safeguarding your organization from the ever-evolving threats of the cyber landscape.
This tutorial serves as a starting point for your journey into the CER phase of the incident response lifecycle. Let the learning continue, and remember, a well-prepared digital defense is your best weapon against the flames of cyber threats.
What steps are included in the third phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle? Select three answers.
Containment, Recovery, Eradication
The third phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle includes the steps Containment, Eradication, and Recovery. Eradication completely removes elements of an incident from all affected systems.
In this video, we’ll discuss the third phase of the
incident response lifecycle. This phase includes
the steps for how security teams contain, eradicate, and recover
from an incident. It’s important to note that
these steps interrelate. Containment helps meet
the goals of eradication, which helps meet the
goals of recovery. This phase of the lifecycle
also integrates with the core functions of the NIST Cybersecurity
Framework, Respond and Recover. Let’s begin with the
first step, containment. After an incident
has been detected, it must be contained. Containment is the
act of limiting and preventing additional damage
caused by an incident. Organizations outline their
containment strategies in incident response plans. Containment strategies
detail the actions that security teams should take after an incident
has been detected. Different containment
strategies are used for various incident types. For example, a common
containment strategy for a malware incident on a single computer
system is to isolate the affected system by
disconnecting it from the network. This prevents the spread of the malware to other
systems in the network. As a result, the incident is contained to the single
compromised system, which limits any further damage. Containment actions
are the first step toward removing a threat
from an environment. Once an incident
has been contained, security teams work to remove all traces of the incident
through eradication. Eradication involves
the complete removal of the incident elements from
all affected systems. For example, eradication
actions include performing vulnerability tests and applying patches to vulnerabilities
related to the threat. Finally, the last
step of this phase in the incident response
lifecycle is recovery. Recovery is the
process of returning affected systems back
to normal operations. An incident can disrupt key business operations
and services. During recovery, any services
that were impacted by the incident are brought
back to normal operation. Recovery actions include:
reimaging affected systems, resetting passwords,
and adjusting network configurations
like firewall rules. Remember, the incident response
lifecycle is cyclical. Multiple incidents
can happen across time and these incidents
can be related. Security teams may have to
circle back to other phases in the lifecycle to conduct
additional investigations. Next up, we’ll discuss the final phase of the
lifecycle. Meet you there.
Reading: Business continuity considerations
Reading
Previously, you learned about how security teams develop incident response plans to help ensure that there is a prepared and consistent process to quickly respond to security incidents. In this reading, you’ll explore the importance that business continuity planning has in recovering from incidents.
Business continuity planning
Security teams must be prepared to minimize the impact that security incidents can have on their normal business operations. When an incident occurs, organizations might experience significant disruptions to the functionality of their systems and services. Prolonged disruption to systems and services can have serious effects, causing legal, financial, and reputational damages. Organizations can use business continuity planning so that they can remain operational during any major disruptions.
Similar to an incident response plan, a business continuity plan (BCP) is a document that outlines the procedures to sustain business operations during and after a significant disruption. A BCP helps organizations ensure that critical business functions can resume or can be quickly restored when an incident occurs.
Entry level security analysts aren’t typically responsible for the development and testing of a BCP. However, it’s important that you understand how BCPs provide organizations with a structured way to respond and recover from security incidents.
Note: Business continuity plans are not the same as disaster recovery plans. Disaster recovery plans are used to recover information systems in response to a major disaster. These disasters can range from hardware failure to the destruction of facilities from a natural disaster, like a flood.
Consider the impacts of ransomware to business continuity
Impacts of a security incident such as ransomware can be devastating for business operations. Ransomware attacks targeting critical infrastructure such as healthcare can have the potential to cause significant disruption. Depending on the severity of a ransomware attack, the accessibility, availability, and delivery of essential healthcare services can be impacted. For example, ransomware can encrypt data, resulting in disabled access to medical records, which prevents healthcare providers from accessing patient records. At a larger scale, security incidents that target the assets, systems, and networks of critical infrastructure can also undermine national security, economic security, and the health and safety of the public. For this reason, BCPs help to minimize interruptions to operations so that essential services can be accessed.
Recovery strategies
When an outage occurs due to a security incident, organizations must have some sort of a functional recovery plan set to resolve the issue and get systems fully operational. BCPs can include strategies for recovery that focus on returning to normal operations. Site resilience is one example of a recovery strategy.
Site resilience
Resilience is the ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disruptions. Organizations can design their systems to be resilient so that they can continue delivering services despite facing disruptions. An example is site resilience, which is used to ensure the availability of networks, data centers, or other infrastructure when a disruption happens. There are three types of recovery sites used for site resilience:
- Hot sites: A fully operational facility that is a duplicate of an organization’s primary environment. Hot sites can be activated immediately when an organization’s primary site experiences failure or disruption.
- Warm sites: A facility that contains a fully updated and configured version of the hot site. Unlike hot sites, warm sites are not fully operational and available for immediate use but can quickly be made operational when a failure or disruption occurs.
- Cold sites: A backup facility equipped with some of the necessary infrastructure required to operate an organization’s site. When a disruption or failure occurs, cold sites might not be ready for immediate use and might need additional work to be operational.
Key takeaways
Security incidents have the potential to seriously disrupt business operations. Having the right plans in place is essential so that organizations can continue to function. Business continuity plans help organizations understand the impact that serious security incidents can have on their operations and work to mitigate these impacts so that regular operations can resume.
Practice Quiz: Test your knowledge: Response and recovery
A security analyst in a security operations center (SOC) receives an alert. The alert ticket describes the detection of the download of a possible malware file on an employee’s computer. Which step of the triage process does this scenario describe?
Receive and assess
This scenario describes receive and assess, the first step of the triage process. In this step, the security analyst receives an alert and determines whether the alert is valid.
AI
The correct answer is Receive and assess.
Here’s why:
- Receive: The analyst has received the alert ticket, indicating the initial intake of information about the potential incident.
- Assess: They are now in the process of evaluating the alert’s details to determine its legitimacy and severity. This involves understanding the nature of the alert (possible malware download), the affected system (employee’s computer), and any additional context provided in the ticket.
The other options are not yet applicable in this scenario:
- Assign priority: Priority assignment comes after assessment, when the analyst understands the incident’s potential impact and urgency.
- Add context: Contextual information, such as recent user activity or related events, is often gathered during investigation, not the initial triage phase.
- Collect and analyze: This phase involves gathering more evidence (e.g., logs, system snapshots) and conducting a deeper analysis to confirm the incident and its scope.
What is triage?
The prioritizing of incidents according to their level of importance or urgency
Triage is the prioritizing of incidents according to their level of importance or urgency.
AI
Out of the options you provided, the one that correctly defines triage is:
- The prioritizing of incidents according to their level of importance or urgency.
Here’s why:
- Triage originated in medicine, where it refers to the process of prioritizing patients based on the severity of their injuries or illnesses. This principle translates well to various fields, including cybersecurity.
- In cybersecurity, incident response teams constantly deal with a multitude of alerts and potential threats. To ensure optimal resource allocation and timely intervention, they need to triage these incidents, meaning they rank them based on their importance and urgency. Factors like threat level, potential impact on systems and data, and urgency of response all play a role in this prioritization.
- While the other options might be related to incident response or recovery, they don’t capture the core essence of triage, which is prioritizing based on importance and urgency.
Therefore, option 3 is the most accurate definition of triage in the context of cybersecurity.
Fill in the blank: _____ is the act of limiting and preventing additional damage caused by an incident.
Containment
Containment is the act of limiting and preventing additional damage caused by an incident.
AI
The correct answer is containment.
Here’s why:
- Recovery: This involves bringing affected systems back to normal operations after an incident has been contained and eradicated.
- Resilience: This refers to the ability of a system or organization to recover from and adapt to adverse events, not the act of limiting damage during an ongoing incident.
- Eradication: This focuses on removing all traces of the incident itself, not preventing further damage from its ongoing effects.
- Containment: This accurately describes the act of stopping the spread of an incident and minimizing its impact, which aligns with the scenario given.
Therefore, containment is the best term to fill in the blank.
Which examples describe actions related to the eradication of an incident? Select two answers.
Apply a patch, Complete a vulnerability scan
Completing a vulnerability scan and applying patches are examples of eradication actions.
AI
The two examples that describe actions related to the eradication of an incident are:
- Apply a patch: This directly addresses a known vulnerability or flaw that might have been exploited during the incident, effectively removing the threat from the system.
- Complete a vulnerability scan: This helps identify any additional vulnerabilities that might have been overlooked or exploited during the incident, ensuring a comprehensive cleanup and preventing future attacks.
The other options are not directly related to eradication:
- Investigating logs is part of the analysis and investigation phase, not the removal of the threat itself.
- Developing a business continuity plan is a proactive measure to ensure business continuity in case of disruptions, but it’s not part of the incident eradication process.
Post-incident actions
Video: The post-incident activity phase of the lifecycle
Key Points:
- Security response doesn’t end with containment and recovery.
- Post-incident activity: Review, assess, and improve!
- Documentation: Create a final report with incident timeline, details, and prevention recommendations.
- Lessons learned meeting: Reflect and share insights within 2 weeks.
- Goals: Minimize future risk and improve response efforts.
- Focus: Share ideas, not blame. Identify human errors as learning opportunities.
Remember: Post-incident activities are crucial for continuous improvement and building a stronger security posture.
Cybersecurity incidents can be like ferocious storms – disruptive, damaging, and demanding immediate attention. But when the clouds clear, the post-incident activity phase emerges as the crucial window for learning, reflection, and fortification. This tutorial will equip you with the tools and insights to navigate this critical stage, transforming past turbulence into future resilience.
Why Post-Incident Activities Matter:
Containment and recovery are victory sprints, but post-incident activities are marathons that build long-term resilience. In this phase, we shift from adrenaline-fueled response to meticulous analysis, asking:
- What went wrong?
- How can we prevent it from happening again?
- How can we improve our response for future storms?
By answering these questions, we turn chaos into opportunity, transforming an incident from a painful memory to a catalyst for growth.
Key Activities in the Post-Incident Phase:
1. Documentation:
- Final Report: Craft a comprehensive narrative of the incident, including timeline, details, response actions, and recommendations for future prevention. This becomes the bible for lessons learned meetings and future reference.
- Review Existing Documentation: Update incident response plans, playbooks, and risk assessments based on the incident’s specific vulnerabilities and challenges.
2. Lessons Learned Meeting:
- Gather the Crew: Convene all stakeholders involved in the incident within two weeks while memories are fresh. This includes security analysts, IT personnel, executives, and any affected departments.
- Open Forum: Foster a non-blaming environment focused on sharing insights, not finding fault. Encourage open discussion about what worked well, what didn’t, and areas for improvement.
- Actionable Outcomes: Document key takeaways, identify specific improvement actions, and assign ownership for implementing them.
3. Deeper Analysis:
- Threat Investigation: Dive deeper into the attacker’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to understand their motivations and identify potential indicators of compromise (IOCs) for future detection.
- Vulnerability Assessment: Identify the vulnerabilities exploited in the incident and prioritize their remediation to strengthen your cyber defenses.
- Human Factors Analysis: Examine human errors involved in the incident, not to blame, but to identify training needs and improve security awareness across the organization.
Remember:
- Continuous Improvement: The post-incident phase is not a one-time activity. Integrate its learnings into your overall security culture, fostering a continuous loop of analysis, improvement, and preparedness.
- Knowledge Sharing: Disseminate learnings from post-incident activities across the organization through training sessions, internal newsletters, and security awareness campaigns.
- Testing and Validation: Regularly test your updated incident response plans and playbooks through simulations and drills to ensure their effectiveness in future storms.
By mastering the post-incident activity phase, you transform cyber incidents from setbacks into stepping stones, ultimately building a more resilient and proactive security posture. So, the next time the storm clouds gather, remember – the calm after the storm holds the power to build a brighter future.
Bonus Tip: Leverage security automation tools to streamline documentation, analysis, and reporting, freeing up your team to focus on deeper insights and strategic improvements.
This tutorial provides a framework for understanding the post-incident activity phase. Feel free to customize it with specific examples from your industry, including tools and techniques relevant to your threat landscape. Together, let’s make every storm an opportunity to build a stronger, more resilient cyber defense.
Which of the following activities do security teams perform during the Post-incident activity phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle? Select two answers.
Create a final report. Identify areas for improvement and learning.
Security teams create a final report and identify areas for improvement and learning during the Post-incident activity phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle.
Now that a security team has
successfully contained eradicated and recovered from an incident,
their job is done, right? Not quite. Whether it’s a new technology or
a new vulnerability, there’s always more to learn
in the security field. The perfect time for learning and
improvement happens during the final phase of the incident response lifecycle,
post-incident activity. The post-incident activity
phase entails the process of reviewing an incident to identify areas
for improvement during incident handling. During this phase of the lifecycle,
different types of documentation get updated or created. One of the critical forms of documentation
that gets created is the final report. The final report is documentation that
provides a comprehensive review of an incident. It includes a timeline and details of
all events related to the incident and recommendations for future prevention. During an incident, the goal of
the security team is to focus efforts on response and recovery. After an incident, security teams work to
minimize the risk of it happening again. One way to improve processes is to
hold a lessons learned meeting. A lessons learned meeting includes all
parties involved in the incident and is generally held within two
weeks after the incident. During this meeting, the incident is
reviewed to determine what happened, what actions were taken, and
how well the actions worked. The final report is also used as the main
reference document during this meeting. The goal of the discussions in a lessons
learned meeting is to share ideas and information about the incident and
how to improve future response efforts. Here are some questions to ask
during a lessons learned meeting: What happened? What time did it happen? Who discovered it? How did it get contained? What were the actions taken for recovery? What could have been done differently? Incident reviews can reveal human errors
before detection and during response, whether it’s a security analyst missing
a step in a recovery process, or an employee clicking a link in a phishing
email, resulting in the spread of malware. Blaming someone for an action they did or
didn’t do should be avoided. Instead security teams can view this as
an opportunity to learn from what happened and improve.
Reading: Post-incident review
Reading
Previously, you explored the Containment, Eradication and Recovery phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle. This reading explores the activities involved in the final phase of the lifecycle: Post-incident activity. As a security analyst, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the activities involved in this phase because each security incident will provide you with an opportunity to learn and improve your responses to future incidents.
Post-incident activity
The Post-incident activity phase of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle is the process of reviewing an incident to identify areas for improvement during incident handling.
Lessons learned
After an organization has successfully contained, eradicated, and recovered from an incident, the incident comes to a close. However, this doesn’t mean that the work of security professionals is complete. Incidents provide organizations and their security teams with an opportunity to learn from what happened and prioritize ways to improve the incident handling process.
This is typically done through a lessons learned meeting, also known as a post-mortem. A lessons learned meeting includes all involved parties after a major incident. Depending on the scope of an incident, multiple meetings can be scheduled to gather sufficient data. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate the incident in its entirety, assess the response actions, and identify any areas of improvement. It provides an opportunity for an organization and its people to learn and improve, not to assign blame. This meeting should be scheduled no later than two weeks after an incident has been successfully remediated.
Not all incidents require their own lessons learned meeting; the size and severity of an incident will dictate whether the meeting is necessary. However, major incidents, such as ransomware attacks, should be reviewed in a dedicated lessons learned meeting. This meeting consists of all parties who participated in any aspect of the incident response process. Here are some examples of questions that are addressed in this meeting:
- What happened?
- What time did it happen?
- Who discovered it?
- How did it get contained?
- What were the actions taken for recovery?
- What could have been done differently?
Besides having the opportunity to learn from the incident, there are additional benefits to conducting a lessons learned meeting. For large organizations, lessons learned meetings offer a platform for team members across departments to share information and recommendations for future prevention.
Pro tip: Before a team hosts a lessons learned meeting, organizers should make sure all attendees come prepared. The meeting hosts typically develop and distribute a meeting agenda beforehand, which contains the topics of discussion and ensures that attendees are informed and prepared. Additionally, meeting roles should be assigned in advance, including a moderator to lead and facilitate discussion and a scribe to take meeting notes.
Recommendations
Lessons learned meetings provide opportunities for growth and improvement. For example, security teams can identify errors in response actions, gaps in processes and procedures, or ineffective security controls. A lessons learned meeting should result in a list of prioritized actions or actionable recommendations meant to improve an organization’s incident handling processes and overall security posture. This ensures that organizations are implementing the lessons they’ve learned after an incident so that they are not vulnerable to experiencing the same incident in the future. Examples of changes that can be implemented include updating and improving playbook instructions or implementing new security tools and technologies.
Final report
Throughout this course, you explored the importance that documentation has in recording details during the incident response lifecycle. At a minimum, incident response documentation should describe the incident by covering the 5 W’s of incident investigation: who, what, where, why, and when. The details that are captured during incident response are important for developing additional documents during the end of the lifecycle.
One of the most essential forms of documentation that gets created during the end of an incident is the final report. The final report provides a comprehensive review of an incident. Final reports are not standardized, and their formats can vary across organizations. Additionally, multiple final reports can be created depending on the audience it’s written for. Here are some examples of common elements found in a final report:
- Executive summary: A high-level summary of the report including the key findings and essential facts related to the incident
- Timeline: A detailed chronological timeline of the incident that includes timestamps dating the sequence of events that led to the incident
- Investigation: A compilation of the actions taken during the detection and analysis of the incident. For example, analysis of a network artifact such as a packet capture reveals information about what activities happen on a network.
- Recommendations: A list of suggested actions for future prevention
Pro tip: When writing the final report, consider the audience that you’re writing the report for. Oftentimes, business executives and other non-security professionals who don’t have the expertise to understand technical details will read post-incident final reports. Considering the audience when writing a final report will help you effectively communicate the most important details.
Key takeaways
Post-incident actions represent the end of the incident response lifecycle. This phase provides the opportunity for security teams to meet, evaluate the response actions, make recommendations for improvement, and develop the final report.
Practice Quiz: Activity: Review a final report
Practice Quiz: Test your knowledge: Post-incident actions
Which section of a final report contains a high-level overview of the security incident?
Executive summary
The executive summary section of a final report contains a high-level overview of the security incident.
What are the goals of a lessons learned meeting? Select two answers.
Review and reflect on a security incident, Identify areas of improvement
The goals of lessons learned meetings are for security teams to review and reflect on a security incident, and identify areas of improvement.
Fill in the blank: In the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle, reviewing an incident to identify areas for improvement during incident handling is known as the _____.
Post-incident activity phase
In the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle, reviewing an incident to identify areas for improvement during incident handling is known as the Post-incident activity phase.
An organization has recovered from a ransomware attack that resulted in a significant disruption to their business operations. To review the incident, the security team hosts a lessons learned meeting. The team realizes that they could have restored the affected systems more quickly if they had a backup and recovery plan in place. Which question would have most likely helped the security team come to this conclusion?
What could have been done differently?
By asking what could have been done differently, the security team can identify areas of weakness in their incident response process, such as the lack of a backup and recovery plan.
Review: Incident investigation and response
Video: Wrap-up
1. Detection and Analysis:
- Purpose: Identify and verify malicious activity.
- Tools: Indicators of compromise (IOCs) and security alerts.
2. Response and Remediation:
- Plans and processes: Documentation, triage, containment, eradication, and recovery.
- Strategies: Swift action, minimizing damage, and restoring normalcy.
3. Post-Incident Activities:
- Final reports and timelines.
- Lessons learned meetings: Reflecting on successes and improvements.
Remember: Your skills are crucial in each phase of the incident response lifecycle.
Next Stop: Dive into the world of logs and explore them with a SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) platform.
This summary succinctly captures the key takeaways from the session on incident investigation and response, highlighting the three phases, essential tools and strategies, and your role as a security analyst. It also creates anticipation for the upcoming topic of logs and SIEM, encouraging viewers to continue their learning journey.
That wraps up our discussion on
incident investigation and response. Nice work on finishing up another section! We’ve covered a lot here, so
let’s take a moment to quickly recap. First, we revisited the detection and
analysis phase of the NIST incident response lifecycle and focused on how
to investigate and verify an incident. We discussed the purpose of detection, and
how indicators of compromise can be used to identify
malicious activity on a system. Next, we examined plans and processes behind the incident response,
such as documentation and triage. We also explored strategies for
containing and eradicating an incident and recovering from it. Finally, we examined the last phase of the
incident lifecycle, post-incident actions. We talked about final reports,
timelines, and the value of scheduling post-incident
reviews through lessons learned meetings. As a security analyst,
you’ll be responsible for completing some processes involved in each
phase of the incident response lifecycle. Coming up, you’ll learn about logs and have the chance to
explore them using a SIEM.
Reading: Glossary terms from module 3
Terms and definitions from Course 6, Module 3
Analysis: The investigation and validation of alerts
Broken chain of custody: Inconsistencies in the collection and logging of evidence in the chain of custody
Business continuity plan (BCP): A document that outlines the procedures to sustain business operations during and after a significant disruption
Chain of custody: The process of documenting evidence possession and control during an incident lifecycle
Containment: The act of limiting and preventing additional damage caused by an incident
Crowdsourcing: The practice of gathering information using public input and collaboration
Detection: The prompt discovery of security events
Documentation: Any form of recorded content that is used for a specific purpose
Eradication: The complete removal of the incident elements from all affected systems
Final report: Documentation that provides a comprehensive review of an incident
Honeypot: A system or resource created as a decoy vulnerable to attacks with the purpose of attracting potential intruders
Incident response plan: A document that outlines the procedures to take in each step of incident response
Indicators of attack (IoA): The series of observed events that indicate a real-time incident
Indicators of compromise (IoC): Observable evidence that suggests signs of a potential security incident
Intrusion detection system (IDS): An application that monitors system activity and alerts on possible intrusions
Lessons learned meeting: A meeting that includes all involved parties after a major incident
Open-source intelligence (OSINT): The collection and analysis of information from publicly available sources to generate usable intelligence
Playbook: A manual that provides details about any operational action
Post-incident activity: The process of reviewing an incident to identify areas for improvement during incident handling
Recovery: The process of returning affected systems back to normal operations
Resilience: The ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from disruptions
Standards: References that inform how to set policies
Threat hunting: The proactive search for threats on a network
Threat intelligence: Evidence-based threat information that provides context about existing or emerging threats
Triage: The prioritizing of incidents according to their level of importance or urgency
VirusTotal: A service that allows anyone to analyze suspicious files, domains, URLs, and IP addresses for malicious content
Quiz: Module 3 challenge
Which step of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle involves the investigation and validation of alerts?
Analysis
AI
The correct answer is Detection.
- Detection is the initial stage of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle where potential security incidents are identified and investigated. This involves:
- Monitoring systems for anomalies and alerts.
- Collecting and analyzing data to verify the legitimacy of alerts.
- Determining the scope and severity of potential incidents.
- Analysis follows detection and involves a deeper investigation to confirm incidents, understand their nature, and assess their impact.
- Recovery focuses on restoring affected systems and services to normal operation after an incident has been contained and eradicated.
- Discovery is not a formal stage in the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle.
What are the benefits of documentation during incident response? Select three answers.
Transparency, Clarity, Standardization
AI
All three answer choices – Transparency, Clarity, and Standardization – are benefits of documentation during incident response. Here’s why:
Transparency:
- Documentation provides a clear record of steps taken, decisions made, and lessons learned during an incident.
- This transparency helps build trust with stakeholders and promotes accountability within the organization.
Clarity:
- Documentation promotes better understanding of the incident, its impact, and the response actions taken.
- This clarity facilitates communication within the team and simplifies future incident response efforts.
Standardization:
- Documented procedures and best practices create a consistent approach to incident response across different situations.
- This standardization ensures efficient handling of incidents and reduces the risk of human error.
Therefore, all three options contribute to the positive impact of documentation in incident response.
Bonus benefit: Documentation can also serve as valuable evidence for forensic investigations and legal proceedings.
An organization is working on implementing a new security tool, and a security analyst has been tasked with developing workflow documentation that outlines the process for using the tool. Which documentation benefit does this scenario outline?
Standardization
AI
The documentation benefit highlighted in this scenario is Standardization.
Here’s why:
- Standardization is about creating consistent processes and ensuring everyone follows the same guidelines for using a tool effectively.
- By developing workflow documentation, the security analyst establishes a standardized approach to using the new security tool.
- This ensures that all users within the organization follow the same steps, reducing the risk of errors, inconsistencies, and potential security gaps.
While clarity and transparency are also valuable benefits of documentation, they aren’t the primary focus in this specific scenario.
- Clarity is about making information easy to understand and interpret.
- Transparency is about making information accessible and visible to relevant parties.
Although the workflow documentation might contribute to clarity and transparency, its primary purpose in this case is to establish a standardized approach to using the tool.
A member of the forensics department of an organization receives a computer that requires examination. On which part of the chain of custody form should they sign their name and write the date?
Custody log
AI
The correct answer is Custody log.
Here’s why:
- The custody log is the section of the chain of custody form that tracks the possession and transfer of evidence throughout its lifecycle.
- It records who has handled the evidence, when, and for what purpose.
- By signing their name and writing the date in the custody log, the forensics team member acknowledges receiving the computer and takes responsibility for its safekeeping.
The other options are not the correct sections for this action:
- Evidence movement documents the physical transfer of evidence from one location to another.
- Description of the evidence provides details about the type, condition, and unique identifiers of the evidence.
- Purpose of transfer explains the reason for moving the evidence (e.g., for examination, storage, or presentation in court).
Which of the following does a semi-automated playbook use? Select two.
Human intervention, Automation
AI
Using triage, which alert would be considered a higher priority and require immediate response?
AI
The alert that would be considered the highest priority and require immediate response is Ransomware detection.
Here’s why:
- Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts files and demands a ransom for their decryption. It poses an immediate and severe threat to the availability and integrity of critical data and systems. Delaying response can lead to widespread data loss, business disruption, and significant financial consequences.
While the other alerts are also important, they generally don’t pose the same level of urgency as ransomware:
- Multiple failed logins from multiple locations could indicate a brute-force attack, but it might also be due to legitimate user errors or forgotten passwords. It warrants investigation, but not necessarily as urgently as ransomware.
- Failed logins with disabled accounts suggest potential account compromises, but the immediate risk is mitigated since the accounts are already disabled.
- A phishing email is a potential entry point for malware or data theft, but it requires user interaction to be successful. It can be addressed through user awareness and email filtering, but it doesn’t pose an immediate threat to systems like ransomware does.
Therefore, in triage, ransomware detection takes precedence over the other alerts due to its potential for immediate and severe damage.
Fill in the blank: Containment is the act of limiting and _____ additional damage caused by an incident.
preventing
AI
The correct answer is preventing.
Containment focuses on stopping the spread of an incident and preventing further damage from occurring. It does not actively remove existing damage like eradication, nor is it solely about detection or simply preventing the initial incident.
Therefore, the complete sentence is: Containment is the act of limiting and preventing additional damage caused by an incident.
Which step of the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle involves returning affected systems back to normal operations?
Recovery
AI
The correct answer is Recovery.
Here’s why:
- Recovery is the stage in the NIST Incident Response Lifecycle dedicated to restoring affected systems and services to their normal state of operation after an incident has been contained and eradicated.
- It involves:
- Rebuilding systems or restoring data from backups.
- Verifying that systems are functioning correctly.
- Implementing any necessary security patches or updates.
- Returning users to their normal workflows.
The other options refer to different stages:
- Response: Encompasses initial actions taken to address an incident, including containment and eradication.
- Containment: Focuses on limiting the spread of an incident and preventing further damage.
- Eradication: Involves removing the root cause of the incident, such as malware or compromised accounts.
Fill in the blank: A lessons learned meeting should be held within ____ weeks of an incident.
two
AI
During a lessons learned meeting following an incident, a meeting participant wants to identify actions that the organization can take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Which section of the final report should they refer to for this information?
Recommendations
AI
The most relevant section of the final report for identifying actions to prevent future incidents would be the Recommendations section.
Here’s why:
- The executive summary provides a high-level overview of the incident, but it typically doesn’t delve into specific preventative measures.
- The timeline tracks the sequence of events during the incident, which might be helpful for understanding the context of recommendations, but it wouldn’t directly list preventative actions.
- The detection section might mention indicators of compromise or vulnerabilities exploited in the incident, but its primary focus is on identifying the incident, not preventing future occurrences.
- The recommendations section, on the other hand, specifically addresses actions that the organization can take to mitigate the risk of similar incidents happening again. It might suggest changes to security policies and procedures, technology upgrades, employee training, and other preventative measures based on the lessons learned from the incident.
Therefore, the participant should look at the Recommendations section to find actionable steps for preventing future incidents.
A security analyst is investigating an alert involving a possible network intrusion. Which of the following tasks is the security analyst likely to perform as part of the Detection and Analysis phase of the incident response lifecycle? Select two answers.
Collect and analyze the network logs to verify the alert. Identify the affected devices or systems.
AI
The two tasks that align with the Detection and Analysis phase are:
- Collect and analyze the network logs to verify the alert: This involves gathering relevant data to confirm the legitimacy of the alert, determine its scope, and understand the nature of the potential intrusion.
- Identify the affected devices or systems: This pinpoints the specific systems or devices that have been compromised or are at risk, allowing for targeted response actions.
The other options belong to later phases of the lifecycle:
- Implement a patch to fix the vulnerability: This falls under the Containment phase, where the goal is to stop the spread of the incident and prevent further damage.
- Isolate the affected machine from the network: This is also a Containment action, aimed at preventing the compromised machine from communicating with other systems and potentially spreading the threat.
What are examples of how transparent documentation can be useful? Select all that apply.
- Meeting cybersecurity insurance requirements
- Demonstrating compliance with regulatory requirements
- Providing evidence for legal proceedings
AI
All of the options provided are examples of how transparent documentation can be useful:
- Meeting cybersecurity insurance requirements: Insurance providers often require detailed documentation of security policies, procedures, and incident response plans to assess an organization’s risk and determine coverage premiums. Transparent documentation aids in meeting these requirements.
- Demonstrating compliance with regulatory requirements: Regulatory bodies often mandate specific security controls and documentation to ensure organizations protect sensitive data and meet industry standards. Transparent documentation provides evidence of compliance.
- Providing evidence for legal proceedings: In the event of a security breach or legal dispute, transparent documentation can serve as crucial evidence to support an organization’s actions or refute claims against it. It can help establish due diligence and adherence to best practices.
- Defining an organization’s security posture: Comprehensive documentation clearly outlines an organization’s security approach, controls, and procedures, enabling stakeholders to understand its security posture, identify potential gaps, and make informed decisions about risk management and resource allocation.
After a security incident involving an exploited vulnerability due to outdated software, a security analyst applies patch updates. Which of the following steps does this task relate to?
Eradication
AI
The task of applying patch updates in response to an exploited vulnerability aligns with the Eradication phase of the incident response lifecycle.
Here’s why:
- Eradication focuses on removing the root cause of the incident to prevent it from recurring. In this case, the root cause is the outdated software with a known vulnerability.
- Applying patch updates addresses this vulnerability, essentially removing the foothold that the attacker exploited to compromise the system.
The other options are not accurate for this specific task:
- Prevention involves proactive measures taken to deter incidents before they happen, such as implementing security controls and raising user awareness.
- Response encompasses initial actions to address an incident, including containment and eradication, but applying patches is more specifically part of eradication.
- Reimaging involves wiping a system’s hard drive and reinstalling the operating system and software. While it can be a way to eradicate malware, it’s typically a more drastic measure than applying patches, which can often resolve vulnerabilities without requiring a full system reimaging.
Fill in the blank: Eradication is the complete _____ of all the incident elements from affected systems.
removal
AI
The correct answer to fill in the blank is removal.
Eradication aims to completely remove all elements of the incident from affected systems. This includes:
- Malware: Any malicious software or code installed during the incident should be eliminated completely.
- Compromised data: Any data accessed or altered by the attacker needs to be removed or restored from backups.
- Exploited vulnerabilities: The vulnerabilities that the attacker leveraged need to be patched or mitigated through other means to prevent future exploitation.
- Other artifacts: Any logs, files, or modifications associated with the incident should be removed or documented for forensic analysis.
Therefore, complete removal (not just isolation, disconnection, or prevention) is the core objective of the eradication phase.
Two weeks after an incident involving ransomware, the members of an organization want to review the incident in detail. Which of the following actions should be done during this review? Select all that apply.
- Create a final report.
- Schedule a lessons learned meeting that includes all parties involved with the security incident.
- Determine how to improve future response processes and procedures.
AI
The two actions that should be taken during a review two weeks after a ransomware incident are:
- Schedule a lessons learned meeting that includes all parties involved with the security incident. This allows for collective reflection on the incident’s scope, response actions, and any shortcomings. It fosters collaboration in identifying areas for improvement in future response processes and procedures.
- Determine how to improve future response processes and procedures. Based on the lessons learned from the incident, the review should identify specific actions to strengthen the organization’s security posture and incident response capabilities. This might include revising policies, implementing new tools, or enhancing training programs.
The other options are not appropriate for this stage of the review process:
- Create a final report: While a final report summarizing the incident is usually created, it’s typically done within days or weeks of the incident itself, not two weeks later. The initial report provides a snapshot of the incident and immediate response actions.
- Determine the person to blame for the incident: Placing blame is unproductive and hinders the learning process. The focus of the review should be on understanding the incident and identifying improvements, not on assigning individual responsibility.
Therefore, the review should emphasize collaborative knowledge sharing and identifying actionable steps to strengthen future incident response efforts.